↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of clarithromycin in pityriasis rosea.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians & Surgeons, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of clarithromycin in pityriasis rosea.
Published in
Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians & Surgeons, November 2014
DOI 11.2014/jcpsp.802805
Pubmed ID
Authors

Najia Ahmed, Nadia Iftikhar, Uzma Bashir, Syed Dilawar Abbas Rizvi, Zafar Iqbal Sheikh, Amir Manzur

Abstract

To determine the efficacy of clarithromycin in the treatment of Pityriasis Rosea (PR).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,715,288
of 7,289,383 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians & Surgeons
#56
of 292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,029
of 224,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians & Surgeons
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,289,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.