↓ Skip to main content

Transdisciplinary working to shape systematic reviews and interpret the findings: commentary

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 166)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transdisciplinary working to shape systematic reviews and interpret the findings: commentary
Published in
Environmental Evidence, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13750-017-0106-y
Authors

Sandy Oliver, Paul Garner, Pete Heywood, Janet Jull, Kelly Dickson, Mukdarut Bangpan, Lynn Ang, Morel Fourman, Ruth Garside

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Unspecified 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 27%
Social Sciences 3 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Unspecified 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Other 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2017.
All research outputs
#893,965
of 12,795,309 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#40
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,153
of 382,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,795,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.