That's quite like my Fig 7 https://t.co/AI1cAIjJSG Effect has been knwn for years, but still ignored https://t.co/Oc35fcsifm
RT @david_colquhoun: @mvholmes you're welcome. Loved your analysis (and that's even before we get to false pos rate https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo…
@mvholmes you're welcome. Loved your analysis (and that's even before we get to false pos rate https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo )
@PhysioChris Please read the Ioannidis reference that I sent, Then https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo It's all explained there
@PhysioChris Risk if bias from funnel plot & Fig 2 shows P value is marginal so -quite likely to be false pos https://t.co/B9KqtaQ3gW
@stephensenn yes, the discrepancies were biggest for n=4. power=0.22 example in my paper https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo
@siminaboca R function power.t.test uses noncentral t dist and gives results close to simulations in https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo @michaelhoffman
@HomeopathicDana p<=0.05? Seriously? Read and learn, Mr Uncredible https://t.co/qKZ5Jdd1Xg #ten23
Yes, But there's a problem, If you ignore the prior you can get a lot of false positives -that's a real prob. https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo https://t.co/eELkcuWyI8
@neilsmalheiser Aha so I guess you're aware of https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo
RT @david_colquhoun: My review about misinterpretation of P values hit 25,000 pdf downloads. Ultimate proof of the uselessness of metrics h…
a note of caution with respect to interpretation of p values... https://t.co/6iRSTjSBFz
RT @TwistedBacteria: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time" https://t.co…
RT @david_colquhoun: My review about misinterpretation of P values hit 25,000 pdf downloads. Ultimate proof of the uselessness of metrics h…
RT @TwistedBacteria: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time" https://t.co…
RT @TwistedBacteria: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time" https://t.co…
RT @TwistedBacteria: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time" https://t.co…
RT @TwistedBacteria: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time" https://t.co…
RT @TwistedBacteria: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time" https://t.co…
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time" https://t.co/5JRiQJQNAK
RT @david_colquhoun: My review about misinterpretation of P values hit 25,000 pdf downloads. Ultimate proof of the uselessness of metrics h…
Why is that useless ... surely it shows you are having influence. Or that you have been doing lots of self downloading!😜 https://t.co/luAzFdPzwx
RT @david_colquhoun: My review about misinterpretation of P values hit 25,000 pdf downloads. Ultimate proof of the uselessness of metrics h…
Did yiu discuss JeffreyLindley paradox in it? When point nulls exist there is no substitute. Will read your review https://t.co/hwsNbEMdPj
RT @david_colquhoun: My review about misinterpretation of P values hit 25,000 pdf downloads. Ultimate proof of the uselessness of metrics h…
RT @david_colquhoun: My review about misinterpretation of P values hit 25,000 pdf downloads. Ultimate proof of the uselessness of metrics h…
RT @david_colquhoun: My review about misinterpretation of P values hit 25,000 pdf downloads. Ultimate proof of the uselessness of metrics h…
My review about misinterpretation of P values hit 25,000 pdf downloads. Ultimate proof of the uselessness of metrics https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G
And this from the man who despises metrics. :-) https://t.co/tdrcYbaYIM
Not at all. Unfortunately 2016 furnished us with ample evidence of the delusions of the masses. 'Few but ripe' the motto of CF Gauss https://t.co/tdrcYbaYIM
@stephensenn @learnfromerror My P value paper has hit 25,000 pdf downloads. Hope that doesn't annoy you too much :-) https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G
@deevybee my (n=1) experience too https://t.co/tNBlxLsOG6 @joergheber @ashleydfarley @mbeisen @gatesfoundation
RT @david_colquhoun: The P=0;05 myth alone can account for much of the irreproducibility https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo and https://t.co/lVfVpfeXs…
RT @david_colquhoun: The P=0;05 myth alone can account for much of the irreproducibility https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo and https://t.co/lVfVpfeXs…
The P=0;05 myth alone can account for much of the irreproducibility https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo and https://t.co/lVfVpfeXs4 https://t.co/vv2ALumMcO
@uclbdi that's true, But would help if there were agreement. I tried to bridge the gap https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo but flak from both sides
@Research_Tim Sure. As long as the other calcs are objective https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo @timothycbates
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values https://t.co/HCyw1Flij6
RT @papakipos: "An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values" | Open Science https://t.co/GdVavljnkN
RT @jeffoscoulos: If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time https://t.co/GG1z…
If you wish to keep your false discovery rate below 5%, you need to use a three-sigma rule, or to insist on p≤0.001 https://t.co/sJAH0VNYnR
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time https://t.co/GG1zwC2zkh
RT @papakipos: "An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values" | Open Science https://t.co/GdVavljnkN
RT @papakipos: "An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values" | Open Science https://t.co/GdVavljnkN
RT @papakipos: "An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values" | Open Science https://t.co/GdVavljnkN
RT @papakipos: "An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values" | Open Science https://t.co/GdVavljnkN
RT @papakipos: "An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values" | Open Science https://t.co/GdVavljnkN
RT @papakipos: "An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values" | Open Science https://t.co/GdVavljnkN
RT @papakipos: "An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values" | Open Science https://t.co/GdVavljnkN
"An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values" | Open Science https://t.co/GdVavljnkN
@SDawlatly If you wnat a bit more detail, try https://t.co/qNUenRWSUc or https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo @mgtmccartney @JuliaHCox
RT @david_colquhoun: @johnmdudley That's much what I said in https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo (& many others). Overoptimistic IMO https://t.co/AI1cA…
@johnmdudley That's much what I said in https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo (& many others). Overoptimistic IMO https://t.co/AI1cAIjJSG @methodsmanmd
@leecronin I think there is agreement in the field that https://t.co/HYU8BhxCj7 is much better than https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo @Peer__Reviewer
@leecronin Best example i know is this -pub in new jnl, no mpact factor, >150,000 views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G @HerzogJS @Peer__Reviewer
RT @david_colquhoun: @toates_19 Thanks, But it's a bit subtle for twitter Better https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo or https://t.co/qNUenRWSUc or htt…
@toates_19 Thanks, But it's a bit subtle for twitter Better https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo or https://t.co/qNUenRWSUc or https://t.co/lVfVpfeXs4
@AliciaOshlack problem is that p-values answer the wrong question https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo
My fav Pval abstract "If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of time." https://t.co/5vHlrWYyU4 https://t.co/0tJjW4cwUX
@MarcusMunafo No I don't agree with that. It's over-optimistic See section 10 https://t.co/AI1cAIjJSG @lakens
and I say AT LEAST 30% (actually 26%) -see section 10 https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo https://t.co/aGbs2drJ5F
@lakens It is true -run the simulations yourself https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo @PsychScientists @tomstafford @maltoesermalte
@PerditaB This one https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo
@rob_aldridge Happy to try, but given that so many researchers don't understand, that could be a bit optimistic https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo
RT @david_colquhoun: .@Neuro_Skeptic NEVER use the words "statistically significant! https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo
.@Neuro_Skeptic NEVER use the words "statistically significant! https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo
RT @EdgarsBernans: Vakara lasāmgabals tiem, kam interesē mat. statistika. (Vēl vairāk tiem, kam neinteresē, bet pielieto). https://t.co/sM3…
Vakara lasāmgabals tiem, kam interesē mat. statistika. (Vēl vairāk tiem, kam neinteresē, bet pielieto). https://t.co/sM3LZdisCF
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
@spiderterritory they are all tiny studies, and most don't get near to P<0.05 (and if they did, it's not worth much https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
Well presented argument that doesn't push Bayes down your throat... https://t.co/fEGgTOR6Ax
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @JamesEBartlett: Essential reading for anyone with a license to use a p value https://t.co/BLPVtIWTPY
Essential reading for anyone with a license to use a p value https://t.co/BLPVtIWTPY
RT @stephensenn: This from a man who disapproves of metrics. Journals take note. :-) https://t.co/9tisMsLFYw
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
Adding to the "everything is fucked" reading list. https://t.co/3MyKjjYawZ
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
This from a man who disapproves of metrics. Journals take note. :-) https://t.co/9tisMsLFYw
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
RT @david_colquhoun: "Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take…
"Misinterpretation of P values" paper hits 150,000 full text views https://t.co/tNBlxLKq4G I hope that journals take notice
@RogueRad ah getting too late to rgue about Bayes now. I had my say https://t.co/B9Kqtayspo
"An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values" Para el debate https://t.co/lXmUxqYQu2