@sampendu @Neuro_Skeptic @PubPeer Yes: most of the discussion of https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj wasn't in the comments sec of paper, but elsewhere
RT @david_colquhoun: I'm amaxed that https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR has passed 13,000 pdf downloads.
@speakezeeorg Thanks. Well, 13.075 actually https://t.co/lFsDIwQi28
I'm amaxed that https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR has passed 13,000 pdf downloads.
RT @healthpsycleeds: Great open access piece by @david_colquhoun on the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values https://t.…
RT @healthpsycleeds: Great open access piece by @david_colquhoun on the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values https://t.…
RT @healthpsycleeds: Great open access piece by @david_colquhoun on the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values https://t.…
RT @healthpsycleeds: Great open access piece by @david_colquhoun on the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values https://t.…
RT @healthpsycleeds: Great open access piece by @david_colquhoun on the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values https://t.…
RT @healthpsycleeds: Great open access piece by @david_colquhoun on the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values https://t.…
RT @healthpsycleeds: Great open access piece by @david_colquhoun on the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values https://t.…
Great open access piece by @david_colquhoun on the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values https://t.co/VcoVjjwJaV #science
RT @david_colquhoun: Wed 27 January I'll be talking about "The misinterpretation of P values and the reproducibility of science" at UCL htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: Wed 27 January I'll be talking about "The misinterpretation of P values and the reproducibility of science" at UCL htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: Wed 27 January I'll be talking about "The misinterpretation of P values and the reproducibility of science" at UCL htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: Wed 27 January I'll be talking about "The misinterpretation of P values and the reproducibility of science" at UCL htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: Wed 27 January I'll be talking about "The misinterpretation of P values and the reproducibility of science" at UCL htt…
Wed 27 January I'll be talking about "The misinterpretation of P values and the reproducibility of science" at UCL https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
@gorskon Pity thst "Rork1" never came back to argue his statistical point, https://t.co/H50VbZTp5e Perhaps he read https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values | Open Science https://t.co/PqMRXSSh5R via @instapaper
@glbryson Yes, good, but (almost) ignores the statistics https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @ScienceBasedMed @dylanbould
@learnfromerror though as I said, I think Ioannidis caalc isn;t quite right -see section 10 https://t.co/fvwZ4THNj8
@schneiderleonid 2/2 and I've wriiten more that most about the bits that aren't -most recently https://t.co/YAXqofDLg7 @stephensenn
@jodyaberdein Harold Jeffrey's said something similar to my paper in 1939. -not at all original https://t.co/ViI3Te1p8g @stephensenn
RT @david_colquhoun: An unoriginal review that's #33 in altmetric scores 2015, & 12k pdf downloads. Metrics inversely related to quality ht…
RT @david_colquhoun: An unoriginal review that's #33 in altmetric scores 2015, & 12k pdf downloads. Metrics inversely related to quality ht…
RT @david_colquhoun: An unoriginal review that's #33 in altmetric scores 2015, & 12k pdf downloads. Metrics inversely related to quality ht…
RT @david_colquhoun: An unoriginal review that's #33 in altmetric scores 2015, & 12k pdf downloads. Metrics inversely related to quality ht…
An unoriginal review that's #33 in altmetric scores 2015, & 12k pdf downloads. Metrics inversely related to quality https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
RT @CousinAmygdala: From @david_colquhoun's article ranked 33rd in Altmetric's Top 100 articles of 2015 https://t.co/nDbgi6qiq8 https://t.c…
RT @CousinAmygdala: From @david_colquhoun's article ranked 33rd in Altmetric's Top 100 articles of 2015 https://t.co/nDbgi6qiq8 https://t.c…
RT @david_colquhoun: 2/2 See https://t.co/m3RvzNPdkc -the paper in question is https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
RT @david_colquhoun: 2/2 See https://t.co/m3RvzNPdkc -the paper in question is https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
#RSOS has this paper at no.33 https://t.co/6Y6bLwzI4d https://t.co/YSllyOZwaK
RT @CousinAmygdala: From @david_colquhoun's article ranked 33rd in Altmetric's Top 100 articles of 2015 https://t.co/nDbgi6qiq8 https://t.c…
From @david_colquhoun's article ranked 33rd in Altmetric's Top 100 articles of 2015 https://t.co/nDbgi6qiq8 https://t.co/xje1UsHJMx
2/2 See https://t.co/m3RvzNPdkc -the paper in question is https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values https://t.co/dzT5DUpgCY #data #dataanalysis #typeIerror
@fidouglas @TimandraHarknes R is remarkaably easy -so much on web. Took me 3 days to write stuff for https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values https://t.co/jlT4ftlfpF
More on p-values: Using p=.05 to declare significance, "you will make a fool of yourself at least 30% of the time" https://t.co/W9md6QtaBL
A curious comment has appeared on my P value paper. I don't think it's right https://t.co/PYwpkSR3s0
.@learnfromerror I have stated my case, clearly I hope, in https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj and I'm happy with 90,000 full text views
RT @joelving: @david_colquhoun's full argument for those interested: https://t.co/UjUG7wFmhP https://t.co/NCJnizJUbP
@michaelhoffman no -should state P=0.037 or whatever, then interpret thus https://t.co/Hb7so5LL6d @jwoodgett @dawnbazely @erikgarrison
RT @dawnbazely: @learnfromerror @AMaxEll17, I expect you know this, but ICYMI: The misinterpretation of p-values by @david_colquhoun https:…
@learnfromerror @AMaxEll17, I expect you know this, but ICYMI: The misinterpretation of p-values by @david_colquhoun https://t.co/ngXWfYfjHj
@david_colquhoun's full argument for those interested: https://t.co/UjUG7wFmhP https://t.co/NCJnizJUbP
@lakens @DrTomCrick One of the best pieces on this recently is by @david_colquhoun https://t.co/pU1Oys5nt5
RT @david_colquhoun: It's one year ago today that The Misinterpretation of P values appeared in a journal. https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
ICYMI: Must read paper for anybody who does research or makes health policy/clinical decisions based on p-value https://t.co/01sMpzvky7
RT @david_colquhoun: It's one year ago today that The Misinterpretation of P values appeared in a journal. https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
RT @david_colquhoun: It's one year ago today that The Misinterpretation of P values appeared in a journal. https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
RT @david_colquhoun: It's one year ago today that The Misinterpretation of P values appeared in a journal. https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
RT @david_colquhoun: It's one year ago today that The Misinterpretation of P values appeared in a journal. https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
RT @david_colquhoun: It's one year ago today that The Misinterpretation of P values appeared in a journal. https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
RT @david_colquhoun: It's one year ago today that The Misinterpretation of P values appeared in a journal. https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
RT @david_colquhoun: It's one year ago today that The Misinterpretation of P values appeared in a journal. https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
It's one year ago today that The Misinterpretation of P values appeared in a journal. https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
reading this paper feels like letting a grumpy old man talk down to me—which is what it literally is, i guess. https://t.co/FEXevWnlfm
What on earth is wrong with @altmetric?. After falling ~200 points it has now leapt up ~500 points in one day! https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
Thought-provoking article on null-hypothesis-based inferential #statistics: https://t.co/PaqrUGFkJQ
RT @david_colquhoun: .@Rokewood My critique of P values was in an #OA journal too new to have a JIF and it's had > 11,000 pdf downloads htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: .@Rokewood My critique of P values was in an #OA journal too new to have a JIF and it's had > 11,000 pdf downloads htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: .@Rokewood My critique of P values was in an #OA journal too new to have a JIF and it's had > 11,000 pdf downloads htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: .@Rokewood My critique of P values was in an #OA journal too new to have a JIF and it's had > 11,000 pdf downloads htt…
@Joe_Vector I just checked, He deals only with P<0.05 which is wrong answer to my Q -see https://t.co/fvwZ4THNj8
@david_colquhoun @Rokewood More importantly, we *read* it, we find it very useful, and we recommend it highly. https://t.co/nrHPGlmSGt
RT @david_colquhoun: .@Rokewood My critique of P values was in an #OA journal too new to have a JIF and it's had > 11,000 pdf downloads htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: .@Rokewood My critique of P values was in an #OA journal too new to have a JIF and it's had > 11,000 pdf downloads htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: .@Rokewood My critique of P values was in an #OA journal too new to have a JIF and it's had > 11,000 pdf downloads htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: .@Rokewood My critique of P values was in an #OA journal too new to have a JIF and it's had > 11,000 pdf downloads htt…
.@Rokewood My critique of P values was in an #OA journal too new to have a JIF and it's had > 11,000 pdf downloads https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
"An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values" https://t.co/NyrK9MW9mV
Don't get excited about borderline results. Simulation study shows that 30% of discoveries with p=0.05 may be false. https://t.co/VIndYjNm0T
@ghopkin You could try the videohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRZMD1cYX_c or the proper paper https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @RoyalStatSoc
@StatsJen hehe that's excellent! But it's about screening not sig tests. I was think about stuff like https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @david_colquhoun: Excellent! But still doesn't mention false postive rate https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR https://t.co/6SVZglSufl
RT @david_colquhoun: Excellent! But still doesn't mention false postive rate https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR https://t.co/6SVZglSufl
RT @david_colquhoun: Excellent! But still doesn't mention false postive rate https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR https://t.co/6SVZglSufl
Excellent! But still doesn't mention false postive rate https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR https://t.co/6SVZglSufl
RT @david_colquhoun: .@stirproftip Don't! It''s nonsense https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj (or https://t.co/jbEqYe5N1q )
.@stirproftip Don't! It''s nonsense https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj (or https://t.co/jbEqYe5N1q )
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values https://t.co/AswmNrScrG
"An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values | Open Science" #statistics https://t.co/cvluUo5RSg
@pmgjones hope they got the point. Heaven kowswhy it's not in most elementary courses (full paper at https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj )
#statistics is problem in #SoftwareEngineering too, see https://t.co/hxQ6G6lnfs for background in #MedicalScience https://t.co/XwQ6cAySTS
@robertjwest that's why I maintain that the arg in https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj isn't Bayesian except in a formal sense https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
@RenegadeSci I'm told that the paper is easy to read https://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj and the video is easier https://t.co/jbEqYe5N1q
RT @david_colquhoun: World statistics day. Do you understand P values? Try https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR or the video https://t.co/jbEqYdObCQ htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: World statistics day. Do you understand P values? Try https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR or the video https://t.co/jbEqYdObCQ htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: World statistics day. Do you understand P values? Try https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR or the video https://t.co/jbEqYdObCQ htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: World statistics day. Do you understand P values? Try https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR or the video https://t.co/jbEqYdObCQ htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: World statistics day. Do you understand P values? Try https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR or the video https://t.co/jbEqYdObCQ htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: World statistics day. Do you understand P values? Try https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR or the video https://t.co/jbEqYdObCQ htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: World statistics day. Do you understand P values? Try https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR or the video https://t.co/jbEqYdObCQ htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: World statistics day. Do you understand P values? Try https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR or the video https://t.co/jbEqYdObCQ htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: World statistics day. Do you understand P values? Try https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR or the video https://t.co/jbEqYdObCQ htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: World statistics day. Do you understand P values? Try https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR or the video https://t.co/jbEqYdObCQ htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: World statistics day. Do you understand P values? Try https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR or the video https://t.co/jbEqYdObCQ htt…