↓ Skip to main content

Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Overview of attention for article published in Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 109)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Published in
Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/ebch.1971
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan J McDonald, Philippa Middleton, Therese Dowswell, Peter S Morris, McDonald, Susan J, Middleton, Philippa, Dowswell, Therese, Morris, Peter S

Abstract

Policies for timing of cord clamping vary, with early cord clamping generally carried out in the first 60 seconds after birth, whereas later cord clamping usually involves clamping the umbilical cord more than one minute after the birth or when cord pulsation has ceased. The benefits and potential harms of each policy are debated.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Other 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2018.
All research outputs
#324,836
of 12,354,690 outputs
Outputs from Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal
#1
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,173
of 267,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,354,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them