You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Contribution of confocal laser scanning microscopy in deciphering biofilm tridimensional structure and reactivity.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 18 |
Book title |
Microbial Biofilms
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-0467-9_18 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-0466-2, 978-1-4939-0467-9
|
Authors |
Bridier A, Briandet R, Arnaud Bridier, Romain Briandet |
Abstract |
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) became in last years an invaluable technique to study biofilms since it enables researchers to explore noninvasively the dynamic architecture and the reactivity of these biological edifices. The constant development of fluorescent markers and genetic tools along with the improvement of spatial, spectral, and temporal resolution of imaging facilities offers new opportunities to better decipher microbial biofilm properties. In this contribution, we proposed to describe the contribution of CLSM to the study of biofilm architecture and reactivity throughout two different illustrative approaches. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 20% |
Professor | 2 | 10% |
Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 20% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 15% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,243,777
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,862
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,129
of 224,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#94
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.