↓ Skip to main content

プロップのレヴィ=ストロースへの反論 : 『民話の形態論』をめぐって

Overview of attention for article published in Studi Italici, March 1975
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
56 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
プロップのレヴィ=ストロースへの反論 : 『民話の形態論』をめぐって
Published in
Studi Italici, March 1975
DOI 10.20583/studiitalici.23.0_97
Authors

谷口 勇

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#991,065
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Studi Italici
#1
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42
of 4,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studi Italici
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 44 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them