You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interventions for promoting the eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine teeth, without the need for surgical exposure, in children aged 9 to 14 years
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012851 |
Authors |
Nicola Parkin, Farhan Bazargani, Philip E Benson, Amarpreet Atwal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 58% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,784,032
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,031
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,675
of 340,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#161
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.