↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for haemolytic uraemic syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for haemolytic uraemic syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003595.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mini Michael, Elizabeth J Elliott, Greta F Ridley, Elisabeth M Hodson, Jonathan C Craig

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 150 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Other 16 10%
Other 46 29%
Unknown 11 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 64%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Psychology 8 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 17 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2015.
All research outputs
#3,177,132
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,381
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,819
of 286,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#157
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.