↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating inadvertent postoperative hypothermia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating inadvertent postoperative hypothermia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009892.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheryl Warttig, Phil Alderson, Gillian Campbell, Andrew F Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 145 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Researcher 19 13%
Unspecified 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Other 52 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 53%
Unspecified 25 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 16 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,484,522
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,098
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,674
of 286,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#177
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.