You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Identifying the m6A Methylome by Affinity Purification and Sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 3 |
| Book title |
RNA Detection
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7213-5_3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7212-8, 978-1-4939-7213-5
|
| Authors |
Phillip J. Hsu, Chuan He |
| Abstract |
N (6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) is the most abundant internal modification in eukaryotic mRNA, and is newly emerging as a key posttranscriptional mRNA regulator. Recent research has uncovered insight into the location and function of m(6)A sites on a large scale, in part due to the transcriptome-wide identification of m(6)A sites by high-throughput sequencing (m(6)A-seq). Here, we present a protocol for m(6)A-seq, which maps the m(6)A methylome by affinity purification and sequencing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 53% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,958,596
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,728
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,668
of 442,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#508
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.