↓ Skip to main content

Institutionalization of deinstitutionalization: a cross-national analysis of mental health system reform

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Institutionalization of deinstitutionalization: a cross-national analysis of mental health system reform
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1752-4458-8-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gordon C Shen, Lonnie R Snowden

Abstract

Policies generate accountability in that they offer a standard against which government performance can be assessed. A central question of this study is whether ideological imprint left by policy is realized in the time following its adoption. National mental health policy expressly promotes the notion of deinstitutionalization, which mandates that individuals be cared for in the community rather than in institutional environments.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 136 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 28%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 32 23%
Psychology 25 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 23 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,555,762
of 19,905,163 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#64
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,418
of 335,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#5
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,905,163 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.