You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complications of regional citrate anticoagulation: accumulation or overload?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-017-1880-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine G. Schneider, Didier Journois, Thomas Rimmelé |
| Abstract |
Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is now recommended over systemic heparin for continuous renal replacement therapy in patients without contraindications. Its use is likely to increase throughout the world. However, in the absence of citrate blood level monitoring, the diagnosis of citrate accumulation, the most feared complication of RCA, remains relatively complex. It is therefore commonly mistaken with other conditions. This review aims at providing clarifications on RCA-associated acid-base disturbances and their management at the bedside. In particular, the authors wish to propose a clear distinction between citrate accumulation and net citrate overload. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| Argentina | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Portugal | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 21% |
| Scientists | 4 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 133 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 45 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,301,751
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,107
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,077
of 445,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#31
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.