You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Family planning need of people living with HIV/AIDS in antiretroviral therapy clinics of Horro Guduru Wollega zone, Ethiopia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13104-017-2914-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Reta Tsegaye |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with family planning needs among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in Ethiopia. Three hundred twenty-one participants provided information on family planning methods and associated factors. Forty-six-point four percent of respondents reported using at least one form of family planning method; injectables (50.3%) and condoms (70.2%) were the most commonly used type of family planning method before and after HIV diagnosis, respectively. Age, the desire to have children, and the desire to have more than two children were significantly associated with the use of family planning methods. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 21% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#19,024,440
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,924
of 4,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,649
of 335,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#94
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.