You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of pain level in cases treated with Invisalign aligner: comparison with fixed edgewise appliance therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Orthodontics, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40510-014-0064-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Koji Fujiyama, Tadashi Honjo, Makoto Suzuki, Shinya Matsuoka, Toru Deguchi |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the difference in the level of pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) between cases treated with the edgewise appliance and Invisalign. In addition, the cause of pain and discomfort in the Invisalign cases was identified. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 212 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 77 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 84 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2014.
All research outputs
#15,170,530
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#81
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,248
of 368,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.