↓ Skip to main content

Probiotics for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probiotics for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006289.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abiola C Senok, Hans Verstraelen, Marleen Temmerman, Giuseppe A Botta

Abstract

The dominance of lactobacilli in healthy vaginal microbiota and its depletion in bacterial vaginosis (BV) has given rise to the concept of oral or vaginal instillation of probiotic Lactobacillus strains for the management of this condition.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 245 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 18%
Student > Bachelor 40 16%
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 14%
Other 20 8%
Other 51 20%
Unknown 26 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 7%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 35 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#781,710
of 13,657,732 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,466
of 10,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,413
of 298,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,657,732 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.