↓ Skip to main content

Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012863
Authors

Apiwat Aue-aungkul, Chumnan Kietpeerakool, Khadra Galaal, Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan, Chetta Ngamjarus, Pisake Lumbiganon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Lecturer 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,596,635
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,576
of 9,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,332
of 384,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#122
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.