↓ Skip to main content

Methotrexate monotherapy versus methotrexate combination therapy with non‐biologic disease modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methotrexate monotherapy versus methotrexate combination therapy with non‐biologic disease modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008495
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wanruchada Katchamart, Judith Trudeau, Veerapong Phumethum, Claire Bombardier

Abstract

Methotrexate (MTX) is among the most effective disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with less toxicity and better tolerability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Bahrain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 202 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Postgraduate 24 11%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Other 48 23%
Unknown 41 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 47 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,042,304
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,353
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,907
of 103,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.