↓ Skip to main content

How does context influence collaborative decision-making for health services planning, delivery and evaluation?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
How does context influence collaborative decision-making for health services planning, delivery and evaluation?
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12913-014-0545-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna R Gagliardi, Fiona Webster, Melissa C Brouwers, Nancy N Baxter, Antonio Finelli, Steven Gallinger

Abstract

Collaboration among researchers (clinician, non-clinician) and decision makers (managers, policy-makers, clinicians), referred to as integrated knowledge translation (IKT), enhances the relevance and use of research, leading to improved decision-making, policies, practice, and health care outcomes. However IKT is not widely practiced due to numerous challenges. This research explored how context influenced IKT as a means of identifying how IKT could be strengthened.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 27 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 36%
Social Sciences 16 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 20%
Unspecified 7 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 10 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2014.
All research outputs
#2,191,408
of 4,561,959 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,252
of 2,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,660
of 144,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#73
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,561,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.