You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A systematic review of the frequency, duration, type and effect of involuntary treatment for people with anorexia nervosa, and an analysis of patient characteristics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Eating Disorders, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40337-014-0029-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Loa Clausen, Allan Jones |
Abstract |
Involuntary treatment of anorexia nervosa is controversial and costly. A better understanding of the conditions that determine involuntary treatment, as well as the effect of such treatment is needed in order to adequately assess the legitimacy of this model of care. The aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency and duration of involuntary treatment, the characteristics of this group of patients, the kind of involuntary actions that are applied and the effect of such actions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 36% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
Finland | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 114 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
Other | 25 | 21% |
Unknown | 22 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 28% |
Psychology | 29 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Unknown | 24 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,606,890
of 24,834,604 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#442
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,304
of 264,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,834,604 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.