↓ Skip to main content

Exercise for cancer cachexia in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise for cancer cachexia in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010804.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Jose Grande, Valter Silva, Rachel Riera, Alessandra Medeiros, Simone GP Vitoriano, Maria S Peccin, Matthew Maddocks

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 126 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 13%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Psychology 7 6%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 28 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,043,935
of 3,064,029 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,964
of 11,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,088
of 304,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,064,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.