↓ Skip to main content

Exercise for cancer cachexia in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise for cancer cachexia in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010804.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Jose Grande, Valter Silva, Rachel Riera, Alessandra Medeiros, Simone GP Vitoriano, Maria S Peccin, Matthew Maddocks

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 167 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 17%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 40 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Psychology 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 48 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2015.
All research outputs
#2,171,090
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,538
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,993
of 370,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.