↓ Skip to main content

Robert J. Richards and Michael Ruse. Debating Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016. Pp. xvi+267. $30.00 (cloth); $18.00 (e-book).

Overview of attention for article published in HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Robert J. Richards and Michael Ruse. Debating Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016. Pp. xvi+267. $30.00 (cloth); $18.00 (e-book).
Published in
HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, September 2017
DOI 10.1086/693430
Authors

Charles H. Pence

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,430,236
of 12,177,594 outputs
Outputs from HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science
#39
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,588
of 336,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,177,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them