You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Movers and Stayers: Novel Assemblages in Changing Environments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard J. Hobbs, Leonie E. Valentine, Rachel J. Standish, Stephen T. Jackson |
| Abstract |
Increased attention to species movement in response to environmental change highlights the need to consider changes in species distributions and altered biological assemblages. Such changes are well known from paleoecological studies, but have accelerated with ongoing pervasive human influence. In addition to species that move, some species will stay put, leading to an array of novel interactions. Species show a variety of responses that can allow movement or persistence. Conservation and restoration actions have traditionally focused on maintaining or returning species in particular places, but increasingly also include interventions that facilitate movement. Approaches are required that incorporate the fluidity of biotic assemblages into the goals set and interventions deployed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 19% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 53% |
| Scientists | 15 | 47% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 264 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 22% |
| Researcher | 59 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Professor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 80 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 78 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 62 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,871,332
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1,071
of 3,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,523
of 449,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#20
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.