↓ Skip to main content

Brain Cell Death Is Reduced With Cooling by 3.5°C to 5°C but Increased With Cooling by 8.5°C in a Piglet Asphyxia Model

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain Cell Death Is Reduced With Cooling by 3.5°C to 5°C but Increased With Cooling by 8.5°C in a Piglet Asphyxia Model
Published in
Stroke, January 2015
DOI 10.1161/strokeaha.114.007330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Alonso-Alconada, Kevin D. Broad, Alan Bainbridge, Manigandan Chandrasekaran, Stuart D. Faulkner, Áron Kerenyi, Jane Hassell, Eridan Rocha-Ferreira, Mariya Hristova, Bobbi Fleiss, Kate Bennett, Dorottya Kelen, Ernest Cady, Pierre Gressens, Xavier Golay, Nicola J. Robertson

Abstract

In infants with moderate to severe neonatal encephalopathy, whole-body cooling at 33°C to 34°C for 72 hours is standard care with a number needed to treat to prevent a adverse outcome of 6 to 7. The precise brain temperature providing optimal neuroprotection is unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 29%
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 18%
Neuroscience 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 10 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#9,236,730
of 12,016,495 outputs
Outputs from Stroke
#6,414
of 7,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,604
of 270,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stroke
#130
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,016,495 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.