↓ Skip to main content

Visual analysis of mass cytometry data by hierarchical stochastic neighbour embedding reveals rare cell types

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
118 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visual analysis of mass cytometry data by hierarchical stochastic neighbour embedding reveals rare cell types
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-01689-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent van Unen, Thomas Höllt, Nicola Pezzotti, Na Li, Marcel J. T. Reinders, Elmar Eisemann, Frits Koning, Anna Vilanova, Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt

Abstract

Mass cytometry allows high-resolution dissection of the cellular composition of the immune system. However, the high-dimensionality, large size, and non-linear structure of the data poses considerable challenges for the data analysis. In particular, dimensionality reduction-based techniques like t-SNE offer single-cell resolution but are limited in the number of cells that can be analyzed. Here we introduce Hierarchical Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (HSNE) for the analysis of mass cytometry data sets. HSNE constructs a hierarchy of non-linear similarities that can be interactively explored with a stepwise increase in detail up to the single-cell level. We apply HSNE to a study on gastrointestinal disorders and three other available mass cytometry data sets. We find that HSNE efficiently replicates previous observations and identifies rare cell populations that were previously missed due to downsampling. Thus, HSNE removes the scalability limit of conventional t-SNE analysis, a feature that makes it highly suitable for the analysis of massive high-dimensional data sets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 269 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 24%
Researcher 61 23%
Student > Master 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Other 16 6%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 48 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 53 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 13%
Computer Science 31 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 7%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 59 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#555,562
of 25,619,480 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#9,525
of 57,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,412
of 447,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#282
of 1,483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,619,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.