↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of clinical and inflammatory profile in opioid addiction patients with comorbid pain: results from a multicenter investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of clinical and inflammatory profile in opioid addiction patients with comorbid pain: results from a multicenter investigation
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, November 2014
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s72785
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zainab Samaan, M. Constantine Samaan, Monica Bawor, James Paul, Carolyn Plater, Guillaume Pare, Andrew Worster, Michael Varenbut, Jeff Daiter, David C. Marsh, Dipika Desai, Lehana Thabane, Brittany Burns Dennis

Abstract

Chronic pain is the most commonly reported comorbidity among patients with opioid addiction receiving methadone maintenance treatment (MMT), with an estimated prevalence ranging between 30% and 55%. Evidence suggests that patients with comorbid pain are at high risk for poor treatment response, including continued illicit substance use. Due to the important relationship between the presence of pain and illicit substance abuse within the MMT setting, it is imperative that we target our efforts toward understanding the characteristics of this patient population.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 16%
Researcher 7 16%
Other 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Other 15 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 42%
Unspecified 9 20%
Psychology 6 13%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Other 4 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,469,850
of 12,517,383 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#750
of 2,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,295
of 286,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#26
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,517,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.