| Title |
Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a4173 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W. Brinjikji, P.H. Luetmer, B. Comstock, B.W. Bresnahan, L.E. Chen, R.A. Deyo, S. Halabi, J.A. Turner, A.L. Avins, K. James, J.T. Wald, D.F. Kallmes, J.G. Jarvik |
| Abstract |
Degenerative changes are commonly found in spine imaging but often occur in pain-free individuals as well as those with back pain. We sought to estimate the prevalence, by age, of common degenerative spine conditions by performing a systematic review studying the prevalence of spine degeneration on imaging in asymptomatic individuals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,056 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 298 | 14% |
| United States | 248 | 12% |
| Spain | 188 | 9% |
| Australia | 83 | 4% |
| Canada | 78 | 4% |
| France | 61 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 48 | 2% |
| Ireland | 32 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 22 | 1% |
| Other | 236 | 11% |
| Unknown | 762 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1640 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 210 | 10% |
| Scientists | 175 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 22 | 1% |
| Unknown | 9 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,773 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1745 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 252 | 14% |
| Other | 249 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 225 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 137 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 127 | 7% |
| Other | 406 | 23% |
| Unknown | 377 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 590 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 376 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 107 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 3% |
| Engineering | 47 | 3% |
| Other | 170 | 10% |
| Unknown | 433 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1894. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,928
of 24,914,266 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 5,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21
of 373,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,914,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.