↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 2,779)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
1644 tweeters
facebook
283 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
3 video uploaders

Readers on

mendeley
573 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, November 2014
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a4173
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Brinjikji, P.H. Luetmer, B. Comstock, B.W. Bresnahan, L.E. Chen, R.A. Deyo, S. Halabi, J.A. Turner, A.L. Avins, K. James, J.T. Wald, D.F. Kallmes, J.G. Jarvik, Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, Bresnahan BW, Chen LE, Deyo RA, Halabi S, Turner JA, Avins AL, James K, Wald JT, Kallmes DF, Jarvik JG, P. H. Luetmer, B. W. Bresnahan, L. E. Chen, R. A. Deyo, J. A. Turner, A. L. Avins, J. T. Wald, D. F. Kallmes, J. G. Jarvik

Abstract

Degenerative changes are commonly found in spine imaging but often occur in pain-free individuals as well as those with back pain. We sought to estimate the prevalence, by age, of common degenerative spine conditions by performing a systematic review studying the prevalence of spine degeneration on imaging in asymptomatic individuals.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,644 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 573 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 2%
Australia 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 537 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 120 21%
Student > Master 100 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 72 13%
Student > Postgraduate 56 10%
Researcher 49 9%
Other 176 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 297 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 119 21%
Unspecified 37 6%
Sports and Recreations 30 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 5%
Other 63 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1337. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,221
of 9,726,029 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 2,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40
of 249,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,726,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,779 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.