↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 2,584)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
1624 tweeters
facebook
266 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
3 video uploaders

Readers on

mendeley
491 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, November 2014
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a4173
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Brinjikji, P.H. Luetmer, B. Comstock, B.W. Bresnahan, L.E. Chen, R.A. Deyo, S. Halabi, J.A. Turner, A.L. Avins, K. James, J.T. Wald, D.F. Kallmes, J.G. Jarvik, Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, Bresnahan BW, Chen LE, Deyo RA, Halabi S, Turner JA, Avins AL, James K, Wald JT, Kallmes DF, Jarvik JG, P. H. Luetmer, B. W. Bresnahan, L. E. Chen, R. A. Deyo, J. A. Turner, A. L. Avins, J. T. Wald, D. F. Kallmes, J. G. Jarvik

Abstract

Degenerative changes are commonly found in spine imaging but often occur in pain-free individuals as well as those with back pain. We sought to estimate the prevalence, by age, of common degenerative spine conditions by performing a systematic review studying the prevalence of spine degeneration on imaging in asymptomatic individuals.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,624 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 491 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 3%
Australia 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 452 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 110 22%
Student > Master 88 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 63 13%
Student > Postgraduate 50 10%
Researcher 42 9%
Other 138 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 261 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 19%
Sports and Recreations 29 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 5%
Unspecified 26 5%
Other 58 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1332. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,006
of 8,664,316 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 2,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37
of 242,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,664,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,584 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.