Fire evolution in the radioactive forests of Ukraine and Belarus: future risks for the population and the environment
Ecological Monographs, February 2015
N. Evangeliou, Y. Balkanski, A. Cozic, W. M. Hao, F. Mouillot, K. Thonicke, R. Paugam, S. Zibtsev, T. A. Mousseau, R. Wang, B. Poulter, A. Petkov, C. Yue, P. Cadule, B. Koffi, J. W. Kaiser, A. P. Møller
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||27||84%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||6%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||6%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||11||13%|
|Student > Bachelor||11||13%|
|Student > Master||10||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||14||16%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||6||7%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||4||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 558. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,385,762 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Monographs
of 958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 361,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Monographs
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,385,762 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.