↓ Skip to main content

Fire evolution in the radioactive forests of Ukraine and Belarus: future risks for the population and the environment

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Monographs, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 776)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Fire evolution in the radioactive forests of Ukraine and Belarus: future risks for the population and the environment
Published in
Ecological Monographs, February 2015
DOI 10.1890/14-1227.1
Authors

N. Evangeliou, Y. Balkanski, A. Cozic, W. M. Hao, F. Mouillot, K. Thonicke, R. Paugam, S. Zibtsev, T. A. Mousseau, R. Wang, B. Poulter, A. Petkov, C. Yue, P. Cadule, B. Koffi, J. W. Kaiser, A. P. Møller

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 24%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 8 12%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 10 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 185. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#118,256
of 17,679,473 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Monographs
#2
of 776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,866
of 315,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Monographs
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,679,473 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them