↓ Skip to main content

C677T gene polymorphism of MTHFR and metabolic syndrome: response to dietary intervention

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
C677T gene polymorphism of MTHFR and metabolic syndrome: response to dietary intervention
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12967-014-0329-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Di Renzo, Luigi Tonino Marsella, Francesca Sarlo, Laura Soldati, Santo Gratteri, Ludovico Abenavoli, Antonino De Lorenzo

Abstract

BackgroundMethylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms were found associated with body mass index (BMI)-defined obesity and lean mass.The aim of our study was to examine the role of the C677T MTHFR gene polymorphism in the response to diet in the management of metabolic syndrome. We investigated the body composition and metabolic factor changes after an hysocaloric balanced diet (HBD), in Italian obese women affected by metabolic syndrome (MS).MethodsForty four obese women affected by MS were eligible for the study. A HBD for 12 weeks was assigned. Study participation included a complete screening for dietary habits, anthropometry, body composition, blood biochemical markers and C677T MTHFR polymorphism genotyping. The study has been registrated by ClinicalTrials.gov Id: NCT01890070.ResultsThe highest number of responders to HBD nutritional intervention were T(¿) carriers (p¿¿¿0.05). In the 81% of the total population a loss of Total Body Lean was observed. A significative loss (p¿¿¿0.05) of Total Body Lean was observed in the 47% of T(¿) carriers and in the 53% of T(+) carriers. Diastolic and systolic blood pressure, and waist circumference were reduced (p¿¿¿0.05). The prevalence of MS parameters decreased by 84% for systolic and diastolic blood pressure; 79,5% for HDL cholesterol, 82% for fasting glucose and 77% for triglycerides.ConclusionsMTHFR genetic variations analysis would be an innovative tool for the nutritional assessment. Our data provide the basis for personalized dietary recommendations based on the individual¿s genetic makeup and nutritional status.Trial registrationThe study has been registrated by ClinicalTrials.gov Id: NCT01890070.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,178,743
of 24,804,602 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,306
of 4,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,305
of 373,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#79
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,804,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.