↓ Skip to main content

Building clinical trial priorities at the University of Rwanda

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Building clinical trial priorities at the University of Rwanda
Published in
Trials, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-467
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeanine Condo, Brenda Kateera, Eugene Mutimura, Francine Birungi, Albert Ndagijimana, Stefan Jansen, Julius Kamwesiga, Jamie I Forrest, Edward J Mills, Agnes Binagwaho

Abstract

After the genocide in Rwanda, the country's healthcare system collapsed. Remarkable gains have since been made by the state to provide greater clinical service capacity and expand health policies that are grounded on locally relevant evidence. This commentary explores the challenges faced by Rwanda in building an infrastructure for clinical trials. Through local examples, we discuss how a clinical trial infrastructure can be constructed by (1) building educational capacity; (2) encouraging the testing of relevant interventions using appropriate and cost-effective designs; and, (3) promoting ethical and regulatory standards. The future is bright for clinical research in Rwanda and with a renewed appetite for locally generated evidence it is necessary that we discuss the challenges and opportunities in drawing up a clinical trials agenda.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 13 26%