↓ Skip to main content

An ontology for microbial phenotypes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An ontology for microbial phenotypes
Published in
BMC Microbiology, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12866-014-0294-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcus C Chibucos, Adrienne E Zweifel, Jonathan C Herrera, William Meza, Shabnam Eslamfam, Peter Uetz, Deborah A Siegele, James C Hu, Michelle G Giglio

Abstract

BackgroundPhenotypic data are routinely used to elucidate gene function in organisms amenable to genetic manipulation. However, previous to this work, there was no generalizable system in place for the structured storage and retrieval of phenotypic information for bacteria.ResultsThe Ontology of Microbial Phenotypes (OMP) has been created to standardize the capture of such phenotypic information from microbes. OMP has been built on the foundations of the Basic Formal Ontology and the Phenotype and Trait Ontology. Terms have logical definitions that can facilitate computational searching of phenotypes and their associated genes. OMP can be accessed via a wiki page as well as downloaded from SourceForge. Initial annotations with OMP are being made for Escherichia coli using a wiki-based annotation capture system. New OMP terms are being concurrently developed as annotation proceeds.ConclusionsWe anticipate that diverse groups studying microbial genetics and associated phenotypes will employ OMP for standardizing microbial phenotype annotation, much as the Gene Ontology has standardized gene product annotation. The resulting OMP resource and associated annotations will facilitate prediction of phenotypes for unknown genes and result in new experimental characterization of phenotypes and functions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Zambia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 60 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 9%
Computer Science 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,138,782
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#664
of 3,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,928
of 361,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#6
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.