↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants in clinical practice: a report from three centers in Sweden

Overview of attention for article published in Thrombosis Journal, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants in clinical practice: a report from three centers in Sweden
Published in
Thrombosis Journal, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12959-014-0029-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashkan Labaf, Martin Carlwe, Peter J Svensson

Abstract

In clinical trials new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have proved to be as effective as warfarin for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these drugs in clinical practise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 57%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,944,793
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Journal
#120
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,444
of 361,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Journal
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them