↓ Skip to main content

Surgical versus medical interventions for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical versus medical interventions for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006991.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Rimmer, Wytske Fokkens, Lee Yee Chong, Claire Hopkins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Unknown 325 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Student > Master 35 11%
Researcher 32 10%
Student > Postgraduate 32 10%
Other 24 7%
Other 69 21%
Unknown 99 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 144 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Psychology 8 2%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 108 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#5,471,255
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,375
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,488
of 369,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#166
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.