↓ Skip to main content

The Mesocolon

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Mesocolon
Published in
Annals of Surgery, December 2014
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000000323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Culligan, Stewart Walsh, Colum Dunne, Michael Walsh, Siobhan Ryan, Fabio Quondamatteo, Peter Dockery, J. Calvin Coffey

Abstract

Colonic mobilization requires separation of mesocolon from underlying fascia. Despite the surgical importance of planes formed by these structures, no study has formally characterized their microscopic features. The aim of this study was to determine the histological and electron microscopic appearance of mesocolon, fascia, and retroperitoneum, prior to and after colonic mobilization.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 9 26%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Other 8 23%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,107,603
of 4,771,353 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#1,223
of 3,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,564
of 162,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#72
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,771,353 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.