You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Identification of Mutated p53 in Cancers by Nongel-Sieving Capillary Electrophoretic SSCP Analysis.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | -1592596767 |
| Book title |
Clinical Applications of Capillary Electrophoresis
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular medicine, January 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1385/1-59259-689-4:127 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-0-89603-639-0, 978-1-59259-689-8
|
| Authors |
M Oto, Oto, M, Michiei Oto |
| Abstract |
The tumor suppressor gene, p53, lies on chromosome 17p, and has been examined in a wide variety of primary tumors, xenografts, and cell lines derived from tumors. Point mutations in the evolutionally conserved codons of p53 have appeared to be the most common genetic alterations in human cancers (1). The p53 mutational spectrum differs among those of cancers of the colon, lungs, esophagus, breast, liver, brain, reticuloendothelial tissues, and hemophoietic tissues. In particular, 75-80% of colon carcinomas exhibit a loss of both p53 alleles, one through deletion and the other through point mutation (1). |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular medicine
#9
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,750
of 99,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them