↓ Skip to main content

TET1 regulates hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition by acting as a co-activator

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TET1 regulates hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition by acting as a co-activator
Published in
Genome Biology, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13059-014-0513-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ya-Ping Tsai, Hsiao-Fan Chen, Sung-Yuan Chen, Wei-Chung Cheng, Hsei-Wei Wang, Zih-Jie Shen, Chunxiao Song, Shu-Chun Teng, Chuan He, Kou-Juey Wu

Abstract

Hypoxia induces the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, EMT, to promote cancer metastasis. In addition to transcriptional regulation mediated by hypoxia-inducible factors, HIFs, other epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation, such as histone modifications and DNA methylation, are utilized under hypoxia. However, whether DNA demethylation mediated by TET1, a DNA dioxygenase converting 5-methylcytosine, 5mC, into 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, 5hmC, plays a role in hypoxia-induced EMT is largely unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
France 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 95 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 26%
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 22%
Chemistry 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 14 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,410,323
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,960
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,151
of 368,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#47
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.