↓ Skip to main content

Brownian Carnot engine

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Physics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
359 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brownian Carnot engine
Published in
Nature Physics, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/nphys3518
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. A. Martínez, É. Roldán, L. Dinis, D. Petrov, J. M. R. Parrondo, R. A. Rica

Abstract

The Carnot cycle imposes a fundamental upper limit to the efficiency of a macroscopic motor operating between two thermal baths1. However, this bound needs to be reinterpreted at microscopic scales, where molecular bio-motors2 and some artificial micro-engines3-5 operate. As described by stochastic thermodynamics6,7, energy transfers in microscopic systems are random and thermal fluctuations induce transient decreases of entropy, allowing for possible violations of the Carnot limit8. Here we report an experimental realization of a Carnot engine with a single optically trapped Brownian particle as the working substance. We present an exhaustive study of the energetics of the engine and analyse the fluctuations of the finite-time efficiency, showing that the Carnot bound can be surpassed for a small number of non-equilibrium cycles. As its macroscopic counterpart, the energetics of our Carnot device exhibits basic properties that one would expect to observe in any microscopic energy transducer operating with baths at different temperatures9-11. Our results characterize the sources of irreversibility in the engine and the statistical properties of the efficiency-an insight that could inspire new strategies in the design of efficient nano-motors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 270 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 67 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 22%
Student > Master 31 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 6%
Professor 16 6%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 43 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 158 56%
Engineering 24 8%
Materials Science 9 3%
Chemistry 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 48 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2021.
All research outputs
#531,449
of 25,342,911 outputs
Outputs from Nature Physics
#538
of 4,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,844
of 291,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Physics
#15
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,342,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.