↓ Skip to main content

Chiropractor interaction and treatment equivalence in a pilot randomized controlled trial: an observational analysis of clinical encounter video-recordings

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chiropractor interaction and treatment equivalence in a pilot randomized controlled trial: an observational analysis of clinical encounter video-recordings
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12998-014-0042-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacie A Salsbury, James W DeVocht, Maria A Hondras, Michael B Seidman, Clark M Stanford, Christine M Goertz

Abstract

Chiropractic care is a complex health intervention composed of both treatment effects and non-specific, or placebo, effects. While doctor-patient interactions are a component of the non-specific effects of chiropractic, these effects are not evaluated in most clinical trials. This study aimed to: 1) develop an instrument to assess practitioner-patient interactions; 2) determine the equivalence of a chiropractor's verbal interactions and treatment delivery for participants allocated to active or sham chiropractic groups; and 3) describe the perceptions of a treatment-masked evaluator and study participants regarding treatment group assignment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Other 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 34%