↓ Skip to main content

Ambient Air Pollution and Health Impact in China

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Air Pollution and Children’s Health in Chinese
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Air Pollution and Children’s Health in Chinese
Chapter number 7
Book title
Ambient Air Pollution and Health Impact in China
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5657-4_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-105656-7, 978-9-81-105657-4
Authors

Wei-Wei Lin, Zan-Xiong Chen, Min-Li Kong, Yan-Qi Xie, Xiao-Wen Zeng, Lin, Wei-Wei, Chen, Zan-Xiong, Kong, Min-Li, Xie, Yan-Qi, Zeng, Xiao-Wen

Abstract

Children can be considered as a high-risk population to environmental stress since some of the organ systems including the immune system and respiratory system are still in development during childhood. During childhood, the impact of environmental pollutants exposure may program child growth and development that have long-term consequences on later health and disease risk. Considering the rapid economic growth in recent decades in China, the impact of ambient air pollution on children health causes concerns. Therefore, we aimed to review the current epidemiological evidence on the effects of air pollution exposure on adverse health outcome, including respiratory diseases, lung function, high blood pressure, cognitive disorder, and obesity in childhood in China. We believe that the findings summarized in our review demonstrate an unequivocal relationship between air pollutants exposure and Chinese children health and these results have large public health influences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 25 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 26 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,576,855
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,324
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,453
of 421,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#333
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.