↓ Skip to main content

Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
49 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2529 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1362 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-01261-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyoko Watanabe, Erdogan Taskesen, Arjen van Bochoven, Danielle Posthuma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1362 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 270 20%
Researcher 239 18%
Student > Master 133 10%
Student > Bachelor 127 9%
Student > Postgraduate 56 4%
Other 174 13%
Unknown 363 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 380 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 151 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 134 10%
Neuroscience 87 6%
Computer Science 37 3%
Other 143 10%
Unknown 430 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2023.
All research outputs
#839,936
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#14,075
of 58,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,766
of 451,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#398
of 1,473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.