↓ Skip to main content

AMADEUS—The acoustic neutrino detection test system of the ANTARES deep-sea neutrino telescope

Overview of attention for article published in Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AMADEUS—The acoustic neutrino detection test system of the ANTARES deep-sea neutrino telescope
Published in
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A, January 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.nima.2010.09.053
Authors

J.A. Aguilar, I. Al Samarai, A. Albert, M. Anghinolfi, G. Anton, S. Anvar, M. Ardid, A.C. Assis Jesus, T. Astraatmadja, J.-J. Aubert, R. Auer, E. Barbarito, B. Baret, S. Basa, M. Bazzotti, V. Bertin, S. Biagi, C. Bigongiari, M. Bou-Cabo, M.C. Bouwhuis, A. Brown, J. Brunner, J. Busto, F. Camarena, A. Capone, C. Cârloganu, G. Carminati, J. Carr, B. Cassano, E. Castorina, V. Cavasinni, S. Cecchini, A. Ceres, Ph. Charvis, T. Chiarusi, N. Chon Sen, M. Circella, R. Coniglione, H. Costantini, N. Cottini, P. Coyle, C. Curtil, G. De Bonis, M.P. Decowski, I. Dekeyser, A. Deschamps, C. Distefano, C. Donzaud, D. Dornic, D. Drouhin, T. Eberl, U. Emanuele, J.-P. Ernenwein, S. Escoffier, F. Fehr, C. Fiorello, V. Flaminio, U. Fritsch, J.-L. Fuda, P. Gay, G. Giacomelli, J.P. Gómez-González, K. Graf, G. Guillard, G. Halladjian, G. Hallewell, H. van Haren, A.J. Heijboer, E. Heine, Y. Hello, J.J. Hernández-Rey, B. Herold, J. Hößl, M. de Jong, N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, O. Kalekin, A. Kappes, U. Katz, P. Keller, P. Kooijman, C. Kopper, A. Kouchner, W. Kretschmer, R. Lahmann, P. Lamare, G. Lambard, G. Larosa, H. Laschinsky, H. Le Provost, D. Lefèvre, G. Lelaizant, G. Lim, D. Lo Presti, H. Loehner, S. Loucatos, F. Louis, F. Lucarelli, S. Mangano, M. Marcelin, A. Margiotta, J.A. Martinez-Mora, A. Mazure, M. Mongelli, T. Montaruli, M. Morganti, L. Moscoso, H. Motz, C. Naumann, M. Neff, R. Ostasch, D. Palioselitis, G.E. Păvălaş, P. Payre, J. Petrovic, N. Picot-Clemente, C. Picq, V. Popa, T. Pradier, E. Presani, C. Racca, A. Radu, C. Reed, G. Riccobene, C. Richardt, M. Rujoiu, M. Ruppi, G.V. Russo, F. Salesa, P. Sapienza, F. Schöck, J.-P. Schuller, R. Shanidze, F. Simeone, M. Spurio, J.J.M. Steijger, Th. Stolarczyk, M. Taiuti, C. Tamburini, L. Tasca, S. Toscano, B. Vallage, V. Van Elewyck, G. Vannoni, M. Vecchi, P. Vernin, G. Wijnker, E. de Wolf, H. Yepes, D. Zaborov, J.D. Zornoza, J. Zúñiga

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 21 51%
Environmental Science 6 15%
Computer Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 4 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#10,968,899
of 18,200,907 outputs
Outputs from Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A
#3,330
of 7,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,132
of 318,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A
#25
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,200,907 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.