↓ Skip to main content

Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000503.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward F Bell, Michael J Acarregui

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 113 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 23 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2018.
All research outputs
#620,575
of 12,926,183 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,061
of 10,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,817
of 293,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,926,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.