↓ Skip to main content

The current status of knowledge of herbal medicine and medicinal plants in Fiche, Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The current status of knowledge of herbal medicine and medicinal plants in Fiche, Ethiopia
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-10-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth d’Avigdor, Hans Wohlmuth, Zemede Asfaw, Tesfaye Awas

Abstract

A majority of Ethiopians rely on traditional medicine as their primary form of health care, yet they are in danger of losing both their knowledge and the plants they have used as medicines for millennia. This study, conducted in the rural town of Fiche in Ethiopia, was undertaken with the support of Southern Cross University (SCU) Australia, Addis Ababa University (AAU) Ethiopia, and the Ethiopian Institute of Biodiversity (EIB), Ethiopia. The aim of this study, which included an ethnobotanical survey, was to explore the maintenance of tradition in the passing on of knowledge, the current level of knowledge about medicinal herbs and whether there is awareness and concern about the potential loss of both herbal knowledge and access to traditional medicinal plants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 219 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 15%
Researcher 20 9%
Lecturer 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 79 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 11%
Chemistry 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 85 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,318,337
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#423
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,861
of 227,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.