↓ Skip to main content

Methenamine hippurate for preventing urinary tract infections

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methenamine hippurate for preventing urinary tract infections
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003265.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bon San B Lee, Tushar Bhuta, Judy M Simpson, Jonathan C Craig

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 15%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 25 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,993,911
of 17,359,532 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,666
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,581
of 419,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,359,532 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.