↓ Skip to main content

TBCRC 008: Early Change in 18F-FDG Uptake on PET Predicts Response to Preoperative Systemic Therapy in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Primary Operable Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Medicine, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TBCRC 008: Early Change in 18F-FDG Uptake on PET Predicts Response to Preoperative Systemic Therapy in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Primary Operable Breast Cancer
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, December 2014
DOI 10.2967/jnumed.114.144741
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roisin M. Connolly, Jeffrey P. Leal, Matthew P. Goetz, Zhe Zhang, Xian C. Zhou, Lisa K. Jacobs, Joyce Mhlanga, Joo H O, John Carpenter, Anna Maria Storniolo, Stanley Watkins, John H. Fetting, Robert S. Miller, Kostandinos Sideras, Stacie C. Jeter, Bridget Walsh, Penny Powers, Jane Zorzi, Judy C. Boughey, Nancy E. Davidson, Lisa A. Carey, Antonio C. Wolff, Nagi Khouri, Edward Gabrielson, Richard L. Wahl, Vered Stearns

Abstract

Epigenetic modifiers, including the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat, may sensitize tumors to chemotherapy and enhance outcomes. We conducted a multicenter randomized phase II neoadjuvant trial of carboplatin and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (CP) with vorinostat or placebo in women with stage II/III, HER2-negative breast cancer, in which we also examined whether change in maximum standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SULmax) on FDG-PET predicted pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast and axillary lymph nodes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Researcher 10 15%
Other 9 13%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 16 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,249,676
of 19,914,721 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#414
of 3,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,713
of 335,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#5
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,914,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.