↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of the organization and operation of vaccine rooms in primary health care in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2015.

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of the organization and operation of vaccine rooms in primary health care in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2015.
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, January 2017
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742017000300013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siqueira, Leila das Graças, Martins, Andréa Maria Eleutério de Barros Lima, Versiani, Cláudia Mendes Campos, Almeida, Lyllian Aparecida Vieira, Oliveira, Claudemilson da Silva, Nascimento, Jairo Evangelista, Alecrim, Bárbara Paloma Almeida, Bezerra, Rafaela Caetano

Abstract

to assess the quality of the organization and operation of vaccine rooms in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil, in 2015. descriptive evaluation study on the quality of vaccine rooms, based on the technical guidelines and standards recommended by the National Immunization Program, using a questionnaire adapted from the Evaluation Program of the Vaccine Room Supervision Tool (PAISSV 2.0). all 18 vaccine rooms in the municipality were assessed; regarding the quality concept of the vaccine rooms, six of them were considered ideal, five good, four regular, and three as insufficient. most vaccine rooms were classified as good/ideal; however, there is a need to organize continuous education programs for professionals and structural improvements, in order to meet the standards recommended by the National Immunization Program.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Student > Master 5 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 29%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#9,377,040
of 12,219,921 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#73
of 196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,081
of 339,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,219,921 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.