↓ Skip to main content

Influência do exercício físico na qualidade de vida de mulheres pós‐menopáusicas com osteoporose

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influência do exercício físico na qualidade de vida de mulheres pós‐menopáusicas com osteoporose
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.rbr.2014.02.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduardo Lucia Caputo, Marcelo Zanusso Costa

Abstract

The present study aimed to conduct a review on the association between exercise and quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A search was performed in PubMed, SciELO, SpringerLink and Sport Discus databases to identify relevant articles that addressed this association. We used the following descriptors in the English and Portuguese languages: osteoporosis, exercise, menopause, women, physical activity, quality of life/osteoporose, exercício físico, menopausa, mulheres, atividade física, qualidade de vida. Regarding quality of life and physical aspects like muscle strength and balance, with the exception of two studies, all others have reported improvement in quality of life and in physical domain of participants. Intervention with exercise has proved essential to improving the quality of life of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Activities that aim at the improvement of muscle strength and balance are essential to prevent falls, and consequently to reduce the incidence of fractures in this population.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 23 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Sports and Recreations 10 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 26 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2014.
All research outputs
#11,290,293
of 19,178,874 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia
#75
of 312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,999
of 329,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,178,874 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 312 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.