You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The role of patients in pressure injury prevention: a survey of acute care patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nursing, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12912-014-0041-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth McInnes, Wendy Chaboyer, Edel Murray, Todd Allen, Peter Jones |
| Abstract |
Pressure injury prevention (PIP) is an important area of patient safety. Encouraging patient participation in care is a growing trend in healthcare as it can increase adherence to treatment plans and improve outcomes. Patients in acute care settings may be able to take on an active role in PIP. However, there is limited information on patients' views of their perceived role in PIP. The aims of our study were to survey hospitalised patients' views on a) their perceived roles in PIP and, b) factors that enable or inhibit patient participation in PIP strategies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 67% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,205,797
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#390
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,057
of 359,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.