↓ Skip to main content

Consensus queries in ligand-based virtual screening experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cheminformatics, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consensus queries in ligand-based virtual screening experiments
Published in
Journal of Cheminformatics, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13321-017-0248-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francois Berenger, Oanh Vu, Jens Meiler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 28%
Student > Master 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 18 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Computer Science 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#810
of 984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,612
of 451,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.