↓ Skip to main content

Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 616,072)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
2073 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images
Published in
arXiv, December 2014
Authors

Anh Nguyen, Jason Yosinski, Jeff Clune

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,160 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,073 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 2072 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 3%
Student > Master 38 2%
Unspecified 26 1%
Researcher 17 <1%
Student > Bachelor 11 <1%
Other 38 2%
Unknown 1884 91%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 69 3%
Engineering 58 3%
Unspecified 30 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 <1%
Physics and Astronomy 7 <1%
Other 15 <1%
Unknown 1884 91%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1067. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,618
of 12,154,763 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#31
of 616,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54
of 277,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#2
of 21,804 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,154,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616,072 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21,804 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.