↓ Skip to main content

Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
433 Mendeley
Title
Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images
Published in
arXiv, December 2014
Authors

Anh Nguyen, Jason Yosinski, Jeff Clune

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,097 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 34 8%
Germany 18 4%
United Kingdom 17 4%
Italy 10 2%
China 9 2%
Japan 7 2%
Australia 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Other 28 6%
Unknown 299 69%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 741 171%
Student > Master 573 132%
Researcher 379 88%
Student > Bachelor 302 70%
Other 124 29%
Other 336 78%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1501 347%
Engineering 378 87%
Physics and Astronomy 89 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 17%
Mathematics 60 14%
Other 272 63%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1052. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,434
of 15,576,177 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#61
of 608,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67
of 305,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#2
of 11,604 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,576,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 608,381 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11,604 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.